CONTACT THE TERRYREPORT HERE

What is The TerryReport?

The TerryReport

What is The TerryReport?

SITE PROBLEMS

Doug Terry

Obama Not in France

Police Strike

Wash. Monument

Greg Mort, Painter

Car Hype?

Obama’s Statement

Ben’s Chili Bowl

Cuba Vacation

Cuban Exiles: No

TSA Changes

Street Protests

Rolling Stone Mess

Prosperity Now

Campus Rapes

i World Trade Center

Who Caused Riots?

Ferguson Updates

Ferguson Live Vid

MARION BARRY DIES

Marion Barry Gone

GOP Plays Nice?

(Some) 2014 posts

SCHOOL SHOOTINGS

DEMOCRATS LOSE

ROCKET EXPLOSION

EBOLA PAGES

CONTACT THE TERRYREPORT HERE

What is The TerryReport?

The TerryReport

CLICK HERE to go to recent posts, nearly 300 pages of news and comments filed during the first nine months of 2013 and during the critical election year of 2012.

CLICK HERE to go back to previous year’s (500+ pages) of The TerryReport

                                                                                                                                   EXPLANATORY JOURNALISM: The TerryReport

                                           News, commentary, opinion on politics, government, books, social trends, American life, travel, cycling, books, other stuff

Article image

Robert Becker, writing a Nation of Change op ed

NOTE:                           The TerryReport publication of a commentary first published elsewhere does not represent an endorsement of the views expressed. It merely means that we find the commentary “interesting” and certainly provocative, with some points that are worthy of consideration.

Today’s nomination for America’s most far-reaching, longest-lasting paradox: how is it our least evolved, least enlightened, low-achieving Southern states set national agendas, even dominate the show. After all, where do emerging stars of the rightwing party reside, namely Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Rick Perry and Marco Rubio? Plus Mitch McConnell and his loyal confederates eager to gridlock the Senate. It’s bad enough when any self-interested minority dictates national terms but worse still when that region, by empirical measurements, represents America’s third-world. As one Forbes pundit overstated, “the common media view of the South is as a regressive region, full of overweight, prejudiced, exploited, and undereducated numbskulls.” You mean someone else got here    first?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Southern forces haven’t decided America’s destiny, but they’ve been a consistent brake on progress. Backwater mindsets, on the wrong side of history again and again (civil, women’s, gay, and minority rights, among others, like abortion and climate change) employ the filibuster to affront both majority rule and progress, whether in science, economics, health, human and voting rights. Do not the Southern States from Maryland to Oklahoma and state-ward towards the Gulf, command disproportionate control, considering they’re only 37% of America, making up in unity what they lacks in heft?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   A mind experiment: if the Old South had been allowed to secede, would the remaining states be as conflicted over abortion or immigration paralysis, and not even debate a national energy plan to confront climate change? Would anyone take seriously the rejection of evolution for the voodoo of Creationism and “intelligent design”? Who doubts the U.S. would, like the civilized world abroad, not enact rigorous gun control that reduces public violence? In retrospect, the Civil War offers the classic example of the winner taking the final battle but not key political wars 150 years later.

While rightwing rabidity spreads beyond Dixie, how long would the GOP anti-governance league endure without true believers below the Mason-Dixon line? Of course, southern Democrats stand complicit with the radical right, as when condoning the triumphant “drill, baby, drill” mantra (deep-water drilling, fracking and the XL Pipeline), maligning Obamacare, tolerating racism, or ignoring global warming.

Evidence Outrages Wishful Thinking

What triggers my focus today is not South-bashing but  a compelling summary entitled These 9 Maps Should Absolutely Outrage Southerners. For once, Huffington Post understates: these maps should outrage America. What the graphics dramatize is the startling consistency of southern backwardness, qualifying as America’s third-world. And if Creationist buffoonery thrives, a stunted region will “secede” intellectually from the modern world, along with scientific skill-sets that assure jobs, higher pay, and economic mobility. Too many states, not only southern ones, wholly distort education to close rather than expand young minds, leaving the rest of us to cover for the “undereducated numbskulls” at large.

Oddly enough, this vaunted land of plenty is anything but. Not only is Dixie our most impoverished region, with minimum minimum wages, and the least economic mobility, it has less affordable medical coverage, the most obesity, the highest teen births, and the highest cigarette usage. Per Wikipedia, the South has lower percentages of high school and college graduates, lower housing values, and lower household incomes. Because southern life expectancy is lower and death rates higher nationally than for all racial groups, one appreciates the century of black migration north. The South, however, boasts lower taxes, less union solidarity, and much more lax business and mining regulations.

A final, unexpected zinger for those who want to go back to Dixie: the South qualifies as our least€ť happy region. That conclusion follows Gallup's “€ťState of American Well-Being” survey, €ť which assesses emotional health, physical health, healthy behaviors, life evaluation, work environment and access to basics, like food, water and shelter. Less unexpected but equally disturbing is a most telling measure for cultural integrity: the eye-popping southern incarceration numbers. High  national incarceration rates (led by Louisiana’s jaw-dropping 1600 inmates per 100K residents) plague southern states (9 of the top 10).  In contrast, that hotbed of crime called New Jersey jails fewer than 300 inmates per 100K. Packed prisons may answer to hard-hearted southern cops, or unforgiving prosecutors, perhaps Southern comfort grows more “criminal types”. But since racial minorities fill up southern prisons, the convicted not only lack work and life opportunities but the wherewithal to hire top legal eagles.

Circling the Bible-belt

And more, for nothing bespeaks Southern defiance of modernity like its direct geographic overlap with the fundamentalist Bible-belt. Instead of many minds, cultures, and books, Bible-thumpers glorify one man-made, heavy-edited scripture not simply as the absolute guide to morality but absolute dictates of an invisible deity. Oy vey. Curiously, ancestors of the African cargo forced into bondage have transcended religious tunnel vision with far more grace. Ancestors of slavery outgrew their abuse, demonstrably more tolerant and compassionate today than those still look for justification of bias from that Old-time religion.

Listen to Rick Perry’s rumbles of justified insurgencies by victimized whites, or Rand Paul’s defiance of majority government, or Ted Cruz rebellious disruption. Or the Kentucky Baptist minister, Matt Singleton, with his peculiar take on education: Outsiders are telling public school families that we must follow the rich man’s elitist religion of evolution, that we no longer have what the Kentucky Constitution says is the right to worship almighty God. Instead, this fascist method teaches that our children are the property of the state.

Ah, the painful irony of reversal: were not all black children for centuries the unequivocal property of the rich elite that scorned non-white human rights? Now that’s systemic fascism. Thus salaried "leaders" insult our intelligence by hallucinating their children are property of a fascist€ť state that simply values enlightenment. Do pious dimwits get the spirit and letter of their own exalted holy book?

Let’s end with revealing research that offers hope for the South while correcting propagandists who link prosperity with the Protestant Ethnic. Check out Atheism Linked to Economic Innovation, with the startling subtitle: Two economists find an association between the percentage of non-believers in a state and the most productive sort of entrepreneurial activity. Time to replace the Protestant with the “Skeptics Ethic”.€ť

Trumping the Old-School Mime

Lookyhere: the percentage of a state’s residents self-described as Christians is “robustly correlated” with a lower score in productive entrepreneurship.   Interestingly, say economists, the percent of the population that is atheist/agnostic is positively related to a state’s productive entrepreneurship score. €ť Apparently, religion imposes opportunity costs on time and resources otherwise devoted toward productive entrepreneurship, thus creating psychic costs to pursuing worldly gains.

That ties in nicely with what needs to be done. If productivity in this world ultimately levels the playing field, providing means and money for a healthy, humane nation, with improved medical care, job training, and emergency disaster support, I say reconsider religious and cultural biases. Pundits left and right bemoan the decline of America but what if modifying backward belief systems, like those revered in the South, could reverse the descent. After all, did not the 19th Century advance by rejecting the slave culture based on racial discrimination? Did not the 20th Century go one step further, rejecting public and legalized discrimination, confirming that separate is not only unequal but wrong.   It’ s not regional or national redemption yet but it’s a direction.

Thus, I don’ t resent funneling taxes collected elsewhere to our neediest region (if under federal, not state oversight). No doubt, we should do more. As well-meaning missionaries bring civilization to the backward, the American majority should look upon the South not as a hotbed of extremism, or tantrum-throwing secessionists, but a great opportunity to offset inherited downsides. Already, Dixie demographics are changing, young southerners are abandoning fundamentalism, and new, darker-skinned neighbors with Hispanic names are moving in (along with older, liberal northerners). What if the South changes in the next century as much as it has in the last?

A healthier, better educated, less fundamentalist South lifts all boats, with the prospect of healing, not worsening the sectional divisiveness that drives so much rightwing demagoguery. If in fact we are only as strong as our weakest link, time to focus on that link, and consider how to help break outmoded, entrenched rusty southern chains. That means recognizing the South is different, even wayward, but capable of change. If cultural evolution is our guide, then today’s pitched battle between modernism and fundamentalism will eventually honor progress and greater enlightenment. Now that’s a Noble Cause a wise majority can get behind.

NOTE:The TerryReport publication of a commentary first published elsewhere does not represent an endorsement of the views  expressed. It merely means that we find the commentary “interesting” and certainly provocative, with some points that are worthy of consideration. There is no doubt that we have a “southern problem” in the U.S. in that the southern states are the center of disagreement about the future direction of the nation. This is not entirely a bad thing, Disagreement brings compromise, it brings awareness of the need for change and improvement and can help to avoid serious mistakes (sometimes). We have entered a period, however, where disagreements have escalated into roadblocking and constant confrontation, which do not assist in the solution of problems. The desire these days of what was once called “the loyal opposition” is not to force compromise, but to stop the government from working so that they can prove that...the government doesn’t work. This is akin to what student radicals and other demonstrators wanted to do in the 1970s.

One reason that the southern states have greater influence than otherwise is that the U.S. Senate was set up deliberately as a non-representative body: Senates represent states, not necessarily the interests of people in those states. There was great concern, and a great battle, over combining the former colonies into a single, national union at the Constitutional Convention. There was an equal dislike of democracy with some of those present. The result was a series of compromises that diluted democracy and increased the power of states in the national government. “The people” lost out.

Over the 230+ years of our national existence, we have added to democracy by changing the way U.S. senators are elected (by direct, popular vote) and by including all adult citizens in voting rights. Whether we want to continue non-representative aspects of our government (the Electoral College, gerrymandered House districts and disproportionate representation in the senate, should be a subject of on-going debate. Unless democracy is protected and expanded, those seeking to weaken and destroy it will have the upper hand.

Doug Terry, 3.26.14

The TerryReport

CLICK HERE

to go to recent posts, nearly 300 pages of news and comments filed during the first nine months of 2013 and during the critical election year of 2012.

CLICK HERE

to go back to prior years (500+ pages) of The TerryReport

                                                                                                                           CONTACT THE TERRYREPORT HERE

                                                                                   CONTACT THE TERRYREPORT HERE